Verified PV performance, at portfolio scale.

A reliable verification layer for solar energy data. Detect deviations faster, validate KPIs against clear assumptions, and generate proof-ready reports for stakeholders

5% Detection threshold

Minimum persistent deviation identified relative to expected energy over defined observation windows.

10×+ Portfolio coverage

Scalable verification applied across distributed assets and multi-site portfolios.

100k+ Systems monitored

Photovoltaic systems evaluated through continuous performance verification.

Pillars

Three pillars for reliable performance verification.

Measured reference

Performance verification starts from measured energy, not device telemetry.

Long-term comparison

Measured and expected production are compared over time to detect persistent deviation.

Structured evidence

Results are organized into reproducible metrics and reports.

Core Platform Features
Admin
+Filter:PremiumYear noticeAlarm yearMonth noticeAlarm monthSearch...SystemPower(kW)LocationProvince/StateProduction lastweekProductionlast 12 monthsEfficiencykWh/kWp(ore)Pv System 116Pv System 117Pv System 118Pv System 119Pv System 120Pv System 121Pv System 122Pv System 123Pv System 124(Owner 1548 12)(Owner 1548 12)(Owner 1548 12)(Owner 1548 12)(Owner 1548 12)(Owner 1548 12)(Owner 1548 12)(Owner 1548 12)(Owner 1548 12)×××××××××150.009.369.0814.4023.5223.0431.0012.874.501,0661,6681,6101,4731,3501,3251,4831,3611,518-26%-15%+37%-15%-8%-32%-3%-91%+2%-29%+11%+17%-3%-4%-6%-1%-13%-2%51%80%85%71%70%69%73%65%73%

KPIs for all the portfolio

All systems are evaluated using IEC 61724–aligned, model-based performance verification. Measured energy is compared against a validated expected model to quantify efficiency and deviations across the portfolio.

  • Measured AC energy at point of interconnection as input to performance verification
  • Independence from inverter vendor logic
Admin
Last 7 daysCurrent year02040608010007/0207/0208/0209/0209/0210/0210/0211/0211/0212/0212/0213/0213/02Current estimatewith radiationrealProductionSource:solaredgeLast measure: 2/14/26 3:00 AMDeviation: Last week -27%, Last month -26%

Expected production modeling

Expected energy is calculated using irradiation data, system configuration, and degradation assumptions, providing a stable baseline for comparison.

  • Weather-based expected production
  • Explicit and reviewable assumptions
Admin
JanuaryFebruaryMarchAprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecemberUnderperformed

Deviation detection over time

The system evaluates how measured production deviates from expected values over time. Persistence is treated as signal, not noise.

  • Deviation magnitude and duration
  • Seasonality and degradation accounted for
Admin
05000100001500020000januaryfebruarymarchaprilmayjunejulyaugustseptemberoctobernovemberdecemberInitial forecastwith historicalaverage radiationCurrent estimatewith actualradiationProduction 2016

From deviation to plausible causes

When measured energy deviates from the expected model, patterns are analyzed to identify plausible causes before inspection, reducing uncertainty and guiding interventions.

  • Deviation patterns compatible with soiling, shading, environmental losses, or electrical/configuration faults
  • Verification of intervention impact (e.g., post-cleaning recovery)
Admin
Production values forthe preceding month (January 2026)| Your plant has produced15% less thanestimated.ESTIMATES FROMWEATHER DATA1148ACTUALLY PRODUCED976HOW IT IS GOING:NOT WELL ☹CHECK ☹LESS THANESTIMATED

Automated performance reporting

The system generates structured reports that document ongoing performance verification over a defined period.

  • Reports generated automatically on a fixed schedule
  • Reports document verified performance and detected deviations
Admin
Connected device integrations

Infrastructure-light integration

Connect existing metering and certified data sources without hardware or field installation. Portfolio-wide performance verification from a single interface.

  • No hardware dependency or on-site installation
  • Vendor-agnostic integration across portfolios
Roles
Owner

Receives regular reports documenting whether the system is producing as expected.

Operator

Provides proactive maintenance through continuous performance verification and periodic reporting.

Installer

Uses consistent verification results to validate system behavior after installation or maintenance.

Auditor

Relies on documented and reproducible outputs for independent verification.

How performance is evaluated

See how measured and expected production are compared, and why the results are defensible.